Has Trump “jumped the fence, but can he act against Israel
VITAL: ‘Fact Checking’ The Nuke That Hit Beirut, Trump Stands with VT (updated)
By
-
August 5, 2020
Senior editor:
Yesterday, Donald Trump, as he does from time to time, said “screw it” and told the truth. He does this from time to time, about 9/11 and other things. His handlers disable his ability to act and from time to time, Donald Trump gets it very right despite the fact the CIA sent William Barr to stand on his brain. From the Daily Beast and CNN:
“Pentagon officials have reportedly said that they have absolutely no idea what President Donald Trump was talking about when he described the gigantic and deadly Beirut explosion as a “terrible attack” carried out using a “bomb of some kind.” On Tuesday, hours after the explosion killed at least a hundred people and wounded thousands, Trump said: “I’ve met with some of our great generals and they just seem to feel that it was not… some kind of manufacturing explosion type of event… They seem to think it was an attack.”
But CNN has reportedly spoken to U.S. defense officials who said there is absolutely no indication that it was an attack and, if there was, efforts would have already been made to protect U.S. troops and assets in the region. That hasn’t happened. Lebanese officials have reportedly raised concerns with U.S. diplomats about Trump’s “attack” language. Lebanon has blamed the explosion on the accidental detonation of more than 2,700 tons of ammonium nitrate.”
That the Pentagon wants to silence the president for getting his own intelligence from foreign contacts, like we do, instead from that pit of “Perfumed Princes,” is absurd. Trump’s back is against the wall and if he is going to do something right while he still can, he needs to act quickly, but can he act against Israel?
Does he have that much power?
What was announced today by CNN is that Israel owns them and it owns the Pentagon and that Trump has “jumped the fence.”
When Clinton Bastin died, WW2 Marine and chief nuclear weapons designer for the US DOE, VT needed a new nuclear weapons expert. 9/11 got us Jeff Smith, particle physicist for the Los Alamos Laboratories of the DOE, a weapons designer and IAEA investigator who had worked in Israel, Syria, Lebanon, Iran, Mali and even spent 2 years in Moscow.
Photo by Jeff Smith, Mali 1991
Jeff on the Golan Heights with the UN
IAEA inspectors (jeff center) in Iran
Jeff, who investigated 9/11 as part of the suppressed DOE effort, proving nuclear weapons were used then (as proven again by German physicist Hans Pommer)
Breathtaking: Solving Nuclear 9/11, the Pommer Report
Jeff came to us in 2014 with evidence that nuclear weapons had been used many times since Hiroshima, often claimed to be fireworks factories (in the middle of nowhere), missile factories or fertilizer storage. He also brought proof that 350 American nuclear pits were stolen including all details of the theft, investigation and coverup.
Then we began writing about small nuclear weapons, that weren’t supposed to exist, starting with this:
And then this, followed by 37 other articles:
Ultimate Leaks: The History of Nuclear Weapons Design 1945-2016
Jeff established that Israel had aided other nations, though the theft of US nuclear pits, in developing weapons, South Africa for sure, North Korea, but also Brazil, Saudi Arabia, Taiwan…
And that the US and Israel had used weapons, in Yemen, in Syria, in Iraq and Afghanistan and in terror attacks, false flag terror, Khobar Towers, Bali, Oklahoma City, Marine Barracks 1983 in Lebanon, whenever a bomb was used where the explosion was bigger than humanly possible and that is often.
The easier the trolls, “fact checkers” and debunkers have it, backed by the fake news, the more nukes will be used, like was just done in Lebanon.
Within hours of VT breaking the news that Israel had nuked Beirut, the ‘fact checkers’ were out in force trying to contradict us, but the best they could do was a pretty pathetic effort comprised of nothing of substance, just regurgitations of the official cover story and quotes from blatantly fraudulent ‘analysis’ of a few bits of video.
Twitter, of course, has come out in full support of the ‘it was not a nuke’ folks:
Twitter also, helpfully, tells us what we need to know:
If we look at which outlets are promoting the ‘it was not a nuke’ lie, it tells us that these outlets are disinfo and never to be trusted, Bellingcat of course, we have always known was a disinfo operation, VICE and Business Insider can now be dded to the list:
One of the first attempts was by someone called Dana Ford working for a site called leadstories.com:
Fact Check: Blast in Beirut Was NOT A Nuclear Explosion
Whoever this Jeffrey Lewis is, he’s clearly spreading pernicious disinfo. His claim that there are ‘none of the phenomena one sees with a nuclear explosion’ is laughable, especially when one of the pictures he posted shows a textbook white hot plasma ball that could only be produced by a nuclear explosion:
Note how the diameter of the plasma ball corresponds to the diameter of the crater it left behind, absolutely no disguising the fact this was a nuke.
Therefore I think it is safe to assume that Jeffrey Lewis, director of the East Asia Nonproliferation Program at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies is a disinfo peddler and the program he heads operates as a gatekeeper hiding the truth of the use of nukes, especially by the US & Israel, something both have bone many times over the last few decades and will no doubt continue to do so, with this terrible event in Beirut being just the latest in a long string of nuclear attrocities.
On Twitter, the pro-Israel trolls have come out in force to attack and threaten me for tweeting the truth about the nuking of Beirut, several have called on the Mossad to murder me, such as the Sussex Friends of Israel:
- Author Details
Author Details
Ian Greenhalgh is a photographer and historian with a particular interest in military history and the real causes of conflicts.
His studies in history and background in the media industry have given him a keen insight into the use of mass media as a creator of conflict in the modern world.
His favored areas of study include state-sponsored terrorism, media manufactured reality and the role of intelligence services in manipulation of populations and the perception of events
